<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ability to make people happy :-)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xoverip.info/archives/66/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xoverip.info/archives/66</link>
	<description>Vernon Trent Fine Arts &#38; Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.xoverip.info/archives/66#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xoverip.info/archives/66#comment-23</guid>
		<description>It's a nice compliment, and it must give you a good feeling. The "sensual but not shameful" criteria is very pertinent when you choose nudes as your subject. It certainly fits your opus. It's also a use of words I haven't seen before, although I have followed the "art vs pornography" debate wherever I come across it. I remember a photo on OE, by Jim Young I think, which stirred such a debate - you might remember it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a nice compliment, and it must give you a good feeling. The &#8220;sensual but not shameful&#8221; criteria is very pertinent when you choose nudes as your subject. It certainly fits your opus. It&#8217;s also a use of words I haven&#8217;t seen before, although I have followed the &#8220;art vs pornography&#8221; debate wherever I come across it. I remember a photo on OE, by Jim Young I think, which stirred such a debate - you might remember it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
